Belize vs Lesotho: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Belize
46.61 million
in 2024
Lesotho
42.40 million
in 2024
Belize rank
156th
Lesotho rank
158th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Belize
- Lesotho
How they compare
Belize currently reports 46.61 million against 42.40 million in Lesotho, a difference of 4.21 million.
That makes Belize's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 156th and Lesotho ranks 158th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.55 million | 5.33 million | 4.21 million | Belize |
| 2010s | 18.54 million | 21.09 million | 2.55 million | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 30.94 million | 34.13 million | 3.19 million | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Belize or Lesotho?
- Belize, at 46.61 million against 42.40 million in Lesotho as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Belize and Lesotho?
- 4.21 million, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Lesotho?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Belize and Lesotho rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Belize ranks 156th and Lesotho ranks 158th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.