Bermuda vs Cape Verde: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Bermuda
38.02 million
in 2024
Cape Verde
35.65 million
in 2023
Bermuda rank
160th
Cape Verde rank
163rd
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Bermuda
- Cape Verde
How they compare
Bermuda currently reports 38.02 million against 35.65 million in Cape Verde, a difference of 2.37 million.
That makes Bermuda's figure about 1.1 times Cape Verde's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Bermuda ranks 160th and Cape Verde ranks 163rd of 187 countries.
Bermuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bermuda | Cape Verde | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 47.90 million | 33.88 million | 14.03 million | Bermuda |
| 2020s | 36.77 million | 30.84 million | 5.93 million | Bermuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Bermuda or Cape Verde?
- Bermuda, at 38.02 million against 35.65 million in Cape Verde as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Bermuda and Cape Verde?
- 2.37 million, with Bermuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Cape Verde?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Bermuda and Cape Verde rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Bermuda ranks 160th and Cape Verde ranks 163rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.