Bermuda vs Eswatini: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Bermuda
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 40.20 million against 38.02 million in Bermuda, a difference of 2.18 million.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Bermuda's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Eswatini ahead.
Bermuda ranks 160th and Eswatini ranks 159th of 187 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bermuda averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bermuda | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 28.74 million | 27.80 million | 933,588 | Bermuda |
| 2020s | 36.77 million | 37.53 million | 754,000 | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Bermuda or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 40.20 million against 38.02 million in Bermuda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Bermuda and Eswatini?
- 2.18 million, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Eswatini?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Bermuda and Eswatini rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Bermuda ranks 160th and Eswatini ranks 159th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.