Botswana vs Montenegro: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Botswana
- Montenegro
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 135.88 million against 129.35 million in Montenegro, a difference of 6.52 million.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 137th and Montenegro ranks 139th of 187 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.79 million | 78.41 million | 13.37 million | Botswana |
| 2010s | 193.48 million | 74.73 million | 118.75 million | Botswana |
| 2020s | 137.19 million | 95.26 million | 41.92 million | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Botswana or Montenegro?
- Botswana, at 135.88 million against 129.35 million in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Botswana and Montenegro?
- 6.52 million, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Montenegro rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Botswana ranks 137th and Montenegro ranks 139th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.