Botswana vs Rwanda: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Botswana
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 148.56 million against 135.88 million in Botswana, a difference of 12.68 million.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 137th and Rwanda ranks 135th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.31 million | 18.64 million | 56.67 million | Botswana |
| 2010s | 193.48 million | 88.28 million | 105.20 million | Botswana |
| 2020s | 137.62 million | 174.86 million | 37.24 million | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Botswana or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 148.56 million against 135.88 million in Botswana as of 2022.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Botswana and Rwanda?
- 12.68 million, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Rwanda?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Botswana and Rwanda rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Botswana ranks 137th and Rwanda ranks 135th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.