Brazil vs Russia: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar … gaps
Brazil
19.65 billion
in 2024
Russia
20.43 billion
in 2021
Brazil rank
31st
Russia rank
30th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar … gaps over time
- Brazil
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 20.43 billion against 19.65 billion in Brazil, a difference of 784.20 million.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 31st and Russia ranks 30th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Russia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.42 billion | 2.71 billion | 705.26 million | Brazil |
| 2000s | 6.26 billion | 6.48 billion | 218.09 million | Russia |
| 2010s | 11.89 billion | 18.36 billion | 6.47 billion | Russia |
| 2020s | 13.44 billion | 18.36 billion | 4.92 billion | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Brazil or Russia?
- Russia, at 20.43 billion against 19.65 billion in Brazil as of 2021.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Brazil and Russia?
- 784.20 million, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Russia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2021.
- How do Brazil and Russia rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Brazil ranks 31st and Russia ranks 30th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.