Cape Verde vs Liberia: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Cape Verde
35.65 million
in 2023
Liberia
31.89 million
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
163rd
Liberia rank
166th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Cape Verde
- Liberia
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 35.65 million against 31.89 million in Liberia, a difference of 3.76 million.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Liberia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Liberia ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 163rd and Liberia ranks 166th of 187 countries.
Liberia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 43.30 million | 44.61 million | 1.31 million | Liberia |
| 2020s | 30.84 million | 35.93 million | 5.09 million | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Cape Verde or Liberia?
- Cape Verde, at 35.65 million against 31.89 million in Liberia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Cape Verde and Liberia?
- 3.76 million, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Liberia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Cape Verde and Liberia rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Cape Verde ranks 163rd and Liberia ranks 166th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.