Cambodia vs Costa Rica: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Cambodia
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 1.19 billion against 1.13 billion in Costa Rica, a difference of 62.16 million.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Cambodia ranks 77th and Costa Rica ranks 80th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.98 million | 361.16 million | 315.18 million | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 248.66 million | 559.64 million | 310.98 million | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 996.52 million | 856.17 million | 140.35 million | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Cambodia or Costa Rica?
- Cambodia, at 1.19 billion against 1.13 billion in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Cambodia and Costa Rica?
- 62.16 million, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Costa Rica?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Cambodia and Costa Rica rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Cambodia ranks 77th and Costa Rica ranks 80th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.