Cambodia vs Latvia: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Cambodia
1.19 billion
in 2024
Latvia
1.13 billion
in 2024
Cambodia rank
77th
Latvia rank
79th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Cambodia
- Latvia
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 1.19 billion against 1.13 billion in Latvia, a difference of 61.31 million.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 77th and Latvia ranks 79th of 187 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.98 million | 265.50 million | 219.52 million | Latvia |
| 2010s | 248.66 million | 601.72 million | 353.06 million | Latvia |
| 2020s | 996.52 million | 1.12 billion | 125.67 million | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Cambodia or Latvia?
- Cambodia, at 1.19 billion against 1.13 billion in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Cambodia and Latvia?
- 61.31 million, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Latvia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Cambodia and Latvia rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Cambodia ranks 77th and Latvia ranks 79th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.