Cameroon vs Cuba: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Cameroon
297.55 million
in 2023
Cuba
310.69 million
in 2022
Cameroon rank
123rd
Cuba rank
122nd
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Cameroon
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 310.69 million against 297.55 million in Cameroon, a difference of 13.14 million.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 123rd and Cuba ranks 122nd of 187 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 36.43 million | 172.72 million | 136.28 million | Cuba |
| 2000s | 60.09 million | 229.93 million | 169.84 million | Cuba |
| 2010s | 211.49 million | 485.99 million | 274.50 million | Cuba |
| 2020s | 190.81 million | 303.92 million | 113.11 million | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Cameroon or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 310.69 million against 297.55 million in Cameroon as of 2022.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Cameroon and Cuba?
- 13.14 million, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Cuba?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2022.
- How do Cameroon and Cuba rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Cameroon ranks 123rd and Cuba ranks 122nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.