Cameroon vs Mozambique: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Cameroon
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 317.74 million against 297.55 million in Cameroon, a difference of 20.20 million.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mozambique ahead.
Cameroon ranks 123rd and Mozambique ranks 121st of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92.89 million | 55.66 million | 37.23 million | Cameroon |
| 2010s | 220.40 million | 345.30 million | 124.90 million | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 217.49 million | 330.67 million | 113.17 million | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Cameroon or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 317.74 million against 297.55 million in Cameroon as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Cameroon and Mozambique?
- 20.20 million, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Mozambique?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Cameroon and Mozambique rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Cameroon ranks 123rd and Mozambique ranks 121st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.