Chile vs South Africa: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Chile
- South Africa
How they compare
Chile currently reports 6.96 billion against 5.86 billion in South Africa, a difference of 1.11 billion.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was South Africa ahead.
Chile ranks 41st and South Africa ranks 43rd of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.37 billion | 4.11 billion | 2.74 billion | South Africa |
| 2010s | 3.04 billion | 6.63 billion | 3.59 billion | South Africa |
| 2020s | 7.56 billion | 5.87 billion | 1.69 billion | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Chile or South Africa?
- Chile, at 6.96 billion against 5.86 billion in South Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Chile and South Africa?
- 1.11 billion, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and South Africa?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Chile and South Africa rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Chile ranks 41st and South Africa ranks 43rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.