China vs Southern African Customs Union (SACU): Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
China
317.00 billion
in 2024
Southern African Customs Union (SACU)
1.54 billion
in 1999
China rank
1st
Southern African Customs Union (SACU) rank
2nd
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- China
- Southern African Customs Union (SACU)
How they compare
China currently reports 317.00 billion against 1.54 billion in Southern African Customs Union (SACU), a difference of 315.46 billion.
That makes China's figure about 206.2 times Southern African Customs Union (SACU)'s.
Across all 6 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
China ranks 1st and Southern African Customs Union (SACU) ranks 2nd of 187 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), China or Southern African Customs Union (SACU)?
- China, at 317.00 billion against 1.54 billion in Southern African Customs Union (SACU) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between China and Southern African Customs Union (SACU)?
- 315.46 billion, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Southern African Customs Union (SACU)?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 1999.
- How do China and Southern African Customs Union (SACU) rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- China ranks 1st and Southern African Customs Union (SACU) ranks 2nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.