Congo vs Jamaica: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Congo
284.45 million
in 2023
Jamaica
274.48 million
in 2023
Congo rank
124th
Jamaica rank
125th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Congo
- Jamaica
How they compare
Congo currently reports 284.45 million against 274.48 million in Jamaica, a difference of 9.97 million.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Jamaica ahead.
Congo ranks 124th and Jamaica ranks 125th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Jamaica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 150.17 million | 118.65 million | 31.52 million | Congo |
| 2010s | 241.31 million | 135.29 million | 106.02 million | Congo |
| 2020s | 145.07 million | 188.43 million | 43.36 million | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Congo or Jamaica?
- Congo, at 284.45 million against 274.48 million in Jamaica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Congo and Jamaica?
- 9.97 million, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Jamaica?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Jamaica rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Congo ranks 124th and Jamaica ranks 125th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.