Cuba vs Jamaica: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Cuba
310.69 million
in 2022
Jamaica
274.48 million
in 2023
Cuba rank
122nd
Jamaica rank
125th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Cuba
- Jamaica
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 310.69 million against 274.48 million in Jamaica, a difference of 36.21 million.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 122nd and Jamaica ranks 125th of 187 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 172.72 million | 64.38 million | 108.34 million | Cuba |
| 2000s | 229.93 million | 91.00 million | 138.93 million | Cuba |
| 2010s | 485.99 million | 177.97 million | 308.02 million | Cuba |
| 2020s | 303.92 million | 159.75 million | 144.17 million | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Cuba or Jamaica?
- Cuba, at 310.69 million against 274.48 million in Jamaica as of 2022.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Cuba and Jamaica?
- 36.21 million, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Jamaica?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2022.
- How do Cuba and Jamaica rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Cuba ranks 122nd and Jamaica ranks 125th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.