Cuba vs Mozambique: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Cuba
310.69 million
in 2022
Mozambique
317.74 million
in 2024
Cuba rank
122nd
Mozambique rank
121st
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Cuba
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 317.74 million against 310.69 million in Cuba, a difference of 7.05 million.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 122nd and Mozambique ranks 121st of 187 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 229.93 million | 46.71 million | 183.23 million | Cuba |
| 2010s | 485.99 million | 249.86 million | 236.13 million | Cuba |
| 2020s | 303.92 million | 297.96 million | 5.96 million | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Cuba or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 317.74 million against 310.69 million in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Cuba and Mozambique?
- 7.05 million, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Mozambique?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Cuba and Mozambique rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Cuba ranks 122nd and Mozambique ranks 121st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.