Cyprus vs Zambia: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Cyprus
511.74 million
in 2024
Zambia
493.05 million
in 2024
Cyprus rank
96th
Zambia rank
98th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Cyprus
- Zambia
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 511.74 million against 493.05 million in Zambia, a difference of 18.69 million.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 96th and Zambia ranks 98th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 125.92 million | 23.96 million | 101.97 million | Cyprus |
| 2000s | 211.22 million | 88.48 million | 122.74 million | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 199.75 million | 326.12 million | 126.37 million | Zambia |
| 2020s | 370.81 million | 314.61 million | 56.20 million | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Cyprus or Zambia?
- Cyprus, at 511.74 million against 493.05 million in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Cyprus and Zambia?
- 18.69 million, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Zambia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Cyprus and Zambia rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Cyprus ranks 96th and Zambia ranks 98th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.