Eswatini vs Niger: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Eswatini
40.20 million
in 2023
Niger
36.91 million
in 2024
Eswatini rank
159th
Niger rank
161st
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Eswatini
- Niger
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 40.20 million against 36.91 million in Niger, a difference of 3.29 million.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Niger's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 159th and Niger ranks 161st of 187 countries.
Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.10 million | 22.49 million | 2.39 million | Niger |
| 2010s | 29.06 million | 98.10 million | 69.04 million | Niger |
| 2020s | 37.53 million | 139.65 million | 102.12 million | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Eswatini or Niger?
- Eswatini, at 40.20 million against 36.91 million in Niger as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Eswatini and Niger?
- 3.29 million, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Niger?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Niger rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Eswatini ranks 159th and Niger ranks 161st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.