Fiji vs Malawi: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Fiji
81.58 million
in 2024
Malawi
93.53 million
in 2024
Fiji rank
147th
Malawi rank
145th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Fiji
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 93.53 million against 81.58 million in Fiji, a difference of 11.96 million.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Fiji's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 147th and Malawi ranks 145th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.28 million | 21.44 million | 9.84 million | Fiji |
| 2010s | 80.44 million | 66.33 million | 14.10 million | Fiji |
| 2020s | 74.51 million | 88.02 million | 13.50 million | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Fiji or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 93.53 million against 81.58 million in Fiji as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Fiji and Malawi?
- 11.96 million, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Malawi?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Fiji and Malawi rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Fiji ranks 147th and Malawi ranks 145th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.