Gambia vs Greenland: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Gambia
21.46 million
in 2024
Greenland
24.43 million
in 2018
Gambia rank
171st
Greenland rank
169th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Gambia
- Greenland
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 24.43 million against 21.46 million in Gambia, a difference of 2.97 million.
That makes Greenland's figure about 1.1 times Gambia's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.
Gambia ranks 171st and Greenland ranks 169th of 187 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.63 million | 10.43 million | 6.80 million | Greenland |
| 2000s | 3.44 million | 13.12 million | 9.68 million | Greenland |
| 2010s | 7.22 million | 23.29 million | 16.07 million | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Gambia or Greenland?
- Greenland, at 24.43 million against 21.46 million in Gambia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Gambia and Greenland?
- 2.97 million, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Greenland?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2018.
- How do Gambia and Greenland rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Gambia ranks 171st and Greenland ranks 169th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.