Gambia vs Grenada: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Gambia
21.46 million
in 2024
Grenada
21.20 million
in 2024
Gambia rank
171st
Grenada rank
172nd
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Gambia
- Grenada
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 21.46 million against 21.20 million in Grenada, a difference of 266,500.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 171st and Grenada ranks 172nd of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 2 and Grenada in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.63 million | 4.44 million | 807,630 | Grenada |
| 2000s | 3.44 million | 6.98 million | 3.54 million | Grenada |
| 2010s | 10.13 million | 8.79 million | 1.34 million | Gambia |
| 2020s | 20.05 million | 15.95 million | 4.10 million | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Gambia or Grenada?
- Gambia, at 21.46 million against 21.20 million in Grenada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Gambia and Grenada?
- 266,500, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Grenada?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Gambia and Grenada rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Gambia ranks 171st and Grenada ranks 172nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.