Gambia vs Solomon Islands: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Gambia
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 21.46 million against 17.05 million in Solomon Islands, a difference of 4.41 million.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.3 times Solomon Islands's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Gambia ranks 171st and Solomon Islands ranks 174th of 187 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.36 million | 3.45 million | 87,690 | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 7.22 million | 11.41 million | 4.19 million | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Gambia or Solomon Islands?
- Gambia, at 21.46 million against 17.05 million in Solomon Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Gambia and Solomon Islands?
- 4.41 million, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Solomon Islands?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
- How do Gambia and Solomon Islands rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Gambia ranks 171st and Solomon Islands ranks 174th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.