Georgia vs Pakistan: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Georgia
1.41 billion
in 2024
Pakistan
1.39 billion
in 2024
Georgia rank
71st
Pakistan rank
72nd
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Georgia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 1.41 billion against 1.39 billion in Pakistan, a difference of 18.39 million.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Pakistan ahead.
Georgia ranks 71st and Pakistan ranks 72nd of 187 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 111.47 million | 945.47 million | 834.00 million | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 305.40 million | 2.24 billion | 1.94 billion | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 812.94 million | 1.88 billion | 1.07 billion | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Georgia or Pakistan?
- Georgia, at 1.41 billion against 1.39 billion in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Georgia and Pakistan?
- 18.39 million, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Pakistan?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Pakistan rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Georgia ranks 71st and Pakistan ranks 72nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.