Greenland vs East Timor: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar … gaps
Greenland
24.43 million
in 2018
East Timor
22.48 million
in 2023
Greenland rank
169th
East Timor rank
170th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar … gaps over time
- Greenland
- East Timor
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 24.43 million against 22.48 million in East Timor, a difference of 1.96 million.
That makes Greenland's figure about 1.1 times East Timor's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.
Greenland ranks 169th and East Timor ranks 170th of 187 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.68 million | 1.41 million | 11.27 million | Greenland |
| 2010s | 24.35 million | 10.04 million | 14.31 million | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Greenland or East Timor?
- Greenland, at 24.43 million against 22.48 million in East Timor as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Greenland and East Timor?
- 1.96 million, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and East Timor?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2018.
- How do Greenland and East Timor rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Greenland ranks 169th and East Timor ranks 170th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.