Indonesia vs Norway: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Indonesia
- Norway
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 15.36 billion against 13.12 billion in Norway, a difference of 2.24 billion.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.2 times Norway's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 34th and Norway ranks 36th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.06 billion | 1.87 billion | 189.85 million | Indonesia |
| 2000s | 2.56 billion | 4.02 billion | 1.46 billion | Norway |
| 2010s | 8.53 billion | 7.65 billion | 875.19 million | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 12.09 billion | 13.32 billion | 1.23 billion | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Indonesia or Norway?
- Indonesia, at 15.36 billion against 13.12 billion in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Indonesia and Norway?
- 2.24 billion, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Norway?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
- How do Indonesia and Norway rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Indonesia ranks 34th and Norway ranks 36th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.