Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Kazakhstan
3.23 billion
in 2024
Serbia
3.35 billion
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
53rd
Serbia rank
51st
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 3.35 billion against 3.23 billion in Kazakhstan, a difference of 119.83 million.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 53rd and Serbia ranks 51st of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.94 billion | 777.21 million | 1.17 billion | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 2.25 billion | 1.19 billion | 1.06 billion | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 1.75 billion | 2.73 billion | 980.23 million | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 3.35 billion against 3.23 billion in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 119.83 million, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Kazakhstan ranks 53rd and Serbia ranks 51st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.