Laos vs Zambia: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar … gaps
Laos
464.94 million
in 2023
Zambia
493.05 million
in 2024
Laos rank
101st
Zambia rank
98th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar … gaps over time
- Laos
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 493.05 million against 464.94 million in Laos, a difference of 28.11 million.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Laos's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zambia ahead.
Laos ranks 101st and Zambia ranks 98th of 187 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Laos averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 190.65 million | 326.12 million | 135.47 million | Zambia |
| 2020s | 317.80 million | 270.00 million | 47.80 million | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Laos or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 493.05 million against 464.94 million in Laos as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Laos and Zambia?
- 28.11 million, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Zambia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Laos and Zambia rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Laos ranks 101st and Zambia ranks 98th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.