Madagascar vs Maldives: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Madagascar
- Maldives
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 120.11 million against 105.27 million in Maldives, a difference of 14.84 million.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.1 times Maldives's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Madagascar ahead.
Madagascar ranks 140th and Maldives ranks 142nd of 187 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.96 million | 26.28 million | 4.68 million | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 84.97 million | 65.98 million | 18.99 million | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 115.36 million | 96.25 million | 19.12 million | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Madagascar or Maldives?
- Madagascar, at 120.11 million against 105.27 million in Maldives as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Madagascar and Maldives?
- 14.84 million, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Maldives?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Madagascar and Maldives rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Madagascar ranks 140th and Maldives ranks 142nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.