Malawi vs Mauritania: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Malawi
93.53 million
in 2024
Mauritania
94.29 million
in 2024
Malawi rank
145th
Mauritania rank
144th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Malawi
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 94.29 million against 93.53 million in Malawi, a difference of 758,300.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 145th and Mauritania ranks 144th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 2 and Mauritania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.70 million | 26.96 million | 8.74 million | Malawi |
| 2010s | 72.03 million | 79.72 million | 7.70 million | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 88.02 million | 85.25 million | 2.77 million | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Malawi or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 94.29 million against 93.53 million in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Malawi and Mauritania?
- 758,300, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Mauritania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and Mauritania rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Malawi ranks 145th and Mauritania ranks 144th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.