Maldives vs Montenegro: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Maldives
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 129.35 million against 105.27 million in Maldives, a difference of 24.09 million.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.2 times Maldives's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Maldives ranks 142nd and Montenegro ranks 139th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.64 million | 38.52 million | 6.88 million | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 65.98 million | 76.45 million | 10.47 million | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 96.25 million | 95.26 million | 982,925 | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Maldives or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 129.35 million against 105.27 million in Maldives as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Maldives and Montenegro?
- 24.09 million, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Maldives and Montenegro rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Maldives ranks 142nd and Montenegro ranks 139th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.