Malta vs Panama: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Malta
437.57 million
in 2024
Panama
446.07 million
in 2024
Malta rank
107th
Panama rank
105th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Malta
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 446.07 million against 437.57 million in Malta, a difference of 8.51 million.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 107th and Panama ranks 105th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 84.35 million | 86.24 million | 1.89 million | Panama |
| 2000s | 144.24 million | 131.04 million | 13.20 million | Malta |
| 2010s | 206.44 million | 570.94 million | 364.49 million | Panama |
| 2020s | 347.96 million | 433.86 million | 85.90 million | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Malta or Panama?
- Panama, at 446.07 million against 437.57 million in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Malta and Panama?
- 8.51 million, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Panama?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Malta and Panama rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Malta ranks 107th and Panama ranks 105th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.