Mauritania vs Suriname: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Mauritania
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 101.66 million against 94.29 million in Mauritania, a difference of 7.37 million.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Mauritania ahead.
Mauritania ranks 144th and Suriname ranks 143rd of 187 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.96 million | 20.80 million | 6.16 million | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 79.72 million | 45.05 million | 34.68 million | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 85.25 million | 85.15 million | 101,660 | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Mauritania or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 101.66 million against 94.29 million in Mauritania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Mauritania and Suriname?
- 7.37 million, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Suriname?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Mauritania and Suriname rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Mauritania ranks 144th and Suriname ranks 143rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.