Mauritius vs Myanmar: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Mauritius
375.00 million
in 2024
Myanmar
347.20 million
in 2024
Mauritius rank
115th
Myanmar rank
118th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Mauritius
- Myanmar
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 375.00 million against 347.20 million in Myanmar, a difference of 27.80 million.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Myanmar ahead.
Mauritius ranks 115th and Myanmar ranks 118th of 187 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 132.70 million | 428.61 million | 295.92 million | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 241.68 million | 491.81 million | 250.13 million | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Mauritius or Myanmar?
- Mauritius, at 375.00 million against 347.20 million in Myanmar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Mauritius and Myanmar?
- 27.80 million, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Myanmar?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Myanmar rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Mauritius ranks 115th and Myanmar ranks 118th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.