Moldova vs Namibia: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Moldova
398.46 million
in 2024
Namibia
384.77 million
in 2024
Moldova rank
111th
Namibia rank
114th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Moldova
- Namibia
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 398.46 million against 384.77 million in Namibia, a difference of 13.69 million.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Namibia ahead.
Moldova ranks 111th and Namibia ranks 114th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Moldova averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.86 million | 80.06 million | 25.20 million | Namibia |
| 2010s | 134.47 million | 219.24 million | 84.78 million | Namibia |
| 2020s | 314.27 million | 219.15 million | 95.13 million | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Moldova or Namibia?
- Moldova, at 398.46 million against 384.77 million in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Moldova and Namibia?
- 13.69 million, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Namibia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Moldova and Namibia rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Moldova ranks 111th and Namibia ranks 114th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.