Montenegro vs Tajikistan: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Montenegro
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 129.35 million against 105.52 million in Tajikistan, a difference of 23.83 million.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.2 times Tajikistan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Montenegro ranks 139th and Tajikistan ranks 141st of 187 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 108.21 million | 106.23 million | 1.98 million | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 95.26 million | 121.12 million | 25.85 million | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Montenegro or Tajikistan?
- Montenegro, at 129.35 million against 105.52 million in Tajikistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Montenegro and Tajikistan?
- 23.83 million, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Tajikistan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Montenegro and Tajikistan rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Montenegro ranks 139th and Tajikistan ranks 141st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.