Mozambique vs Myanmar: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Mozambique
317.74 million
in 2024
Myanmar
347.20 million
in 2024
Mozambique rank
121st
Myanmar rank
118th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Mozambique
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 347.20 million against 317.74 million in Mozambique, a difference of 29.45 million.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Myanmar ahead.
Mozambique ranks 121st and Myanmar ranks 118th of 187 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 345.30 million | 428.61 million | 83.31 million | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 328.08 million | 491.81 million | 163.73 million | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Mozambique or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 347.20 million against 317.74 million in Mozambique as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Mozambique and Myanmar?
- 29.45 million, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Myanmar?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Mozambique and Myanmar rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Mozambique ranks 121st and Myanmar ranks 118th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.