Namibia vs Nepal: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Namibia
384.77 million
in 2024
Nepal
372.47 million
in 2022
Namibia rank
114th
Nepal rank
116th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Namibia
- Nepal
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 384.77 million against 372.47 million in Nepal, a difference of 12.30 million.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nepal ahead.
Namibia ranks 114th and Nepal ranks 116th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.74 million | 48.77 million | 36.97 million | Namibia |
| 2010s | 219.24 million | 215.72 million | 3.53 million | Namibia |
| 2020s | 158.82 million | 360.00 million | 201.19 million | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Namibia or Nepal?
- Namibia, at 384.77 million against 372.47 million in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Namibia and Nepal?
- 12.30 million, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Nepal?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Namibia and Nepal rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Namibia ranks 114th and Nepal ranks 116th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.