New Zealand vs Serbia: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
New Zealand
3.42 billion
in 2024
Serbia
3.35 billion
in 2024
New Zealand rank
50th
Serbia rank
51st
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- New Zealand
- Serbia
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 3.42 billion against 3.35 billion in Serbia, a difference of 70.41 million.
Across all 19 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 50th and Serbia ranks 51st of 187 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.25 billion | 777.21 million | 469.75 million | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 1.55 billion | 1.19 billion | 357.00 million | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 3.19 billion | 2.73 billion | 463.14 million | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), New Zealand or Serbia?
- New Zealand, at 3.42 billion against 3.35 billion in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between New Zealand and Serbia?
- 70.41 million, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and Serbia rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- New Zealand ranks 50th and Serbia ranks 51st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.