Poland vs Singapore: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Poland
- Singapore
How they compare
Poland currently reports 49.13 billion against 37.47 billion in Singapore, a difference of 11.66 billion.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.3 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Singapore ahead.
Poland ranks 13th and Singapore ranks 16th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.19 billion | 8.72 billion | 6.53 billion | Singapore |
| 2000s | 6.93 billion | 15.46 billion | 8.54 billion | Singapore |
| 2010s | 16.24 billion | 33.52 billion | 17.28 billion | Singapore |
| 2020s | 42.19 billion | 39.26 billion | 2.93 billion | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Poland or Singapore?
- Poland, at 49.13 billion against 37.47 billion in Singapore as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Poland and Singapore?
- 11.66 billion, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Singapore?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
- How do Poland and Singapore rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Poland ranks 13th and Singapore ranks 16th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.