Senegal vs Zimbabwe: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Senegal
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 424.81 million against 393.80 million in Senegal, a difference of 31.01 million.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Senegal's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Senegal ahead.
Senegal ranks 112th and Zimbabwe ranks 109th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Senegal averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Senegal | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.35 million | 48.43 million | 37.92 million | Senegal |
| 2010s | 137.54 million | 140.30 million | 2.76 million | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 339.22 million | 346.83 million | 7.61 million | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Senegal or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 424.81 million against 393.80 million in Senegal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Senegal and Zimbabwe?
- 31.01 million, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Senegal and Zimbabwe?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Senegal and Zimbabwe rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Senegal ranks 112th and Zimbabwe ranks 109th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.