Southern African Customs Union (SACU) vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)

Southern African Customs Union (SACU)
1.54 billion
in 1999
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
102.00 billion
in 2024
Southern African Customs Union (SACU) rank
2nd
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
5th

Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time

  • Southern African Customs Union (SACU)
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
025.0B50.0B75.0B100.0B199420092024

How they compare

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland currently reports 102.00 billion against 1.54 billion in Southern African Customs Union (SACU), a difference of 100.46 billion.

That makes United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's figure about 66.3 times Southern African Customs Union (SACU)'s.

Across all 6 years both countries report, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has been ahead every year.

Southern African Customs Union (SACU) ranks 2nd and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 5th of 3 groups.

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Southern African Customs Union (SACU) or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, at 102.00 billion against 1.54 billion in Southern African Customs Union (SACU) as of 2024.
What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Southern African Customs Union (SACU) and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
100.46 billion, with United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Southern African Customs Union (SACU) and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
6 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 1999.
How do Southern African Customs Union (SACU) and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
Southern African Customs Union (SACU) ranks 2nd and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 5th of 3 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Southern African Customs Union (SACU) vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/total-trade-in-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-gaps-filled/southern-african-customs-union-sacu/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/total-trade-in-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-gaps-filled/southern-african-customs-union-sacu/united-kingdom/">Southern African Customs Union (SACU) vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 4,859 data points, 1994–2024
Last refreshed

Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.