What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Southern African Customs Union (SACU) and United Kingdom?

100.46 billion, with United Kingdom ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Southern African Customs Union (SACU) and United Kingdom?

6 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 1999.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Southern African Customs Union (SACU) vs United Kingdom: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar … gaps

Southern African Customs Union (SACU)

1.54 billion

in 1999

United Kingdom

102.00 billion

in 2024

Southern African Customs Union (SACU) rank

2nd

United Kingdom rank

5th

Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar … gaps over time

Southern African Customs Union (SACU)
United Kingdom

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 102.00 billion against 1.54 billion in Southern African Customs Union (SACU), a difference of 100.46 billion.

That makes United Kingdom's figure about 66.3 times Southern African Customs Union (SACU)'s.

Across all 6 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.

Southern African Customs Union (SACU) ranks 2nd and United Kingdom ranks 5th of 3 groups.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Southern African Customs Union (SACU) or United Kingdom?: United Kingdom, at 102.00 billion against 1.54 billion in Southern African Customs Union (SACU) as of 2024.
What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Southern African Customs Union (SACU) and United Kingdom?: 100.46 billion, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Southern African Customs Union (SACU) and United Kingdom?: 6 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 1999.
How do Southern African Customs Union (SACU) and United Kingdom rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?: Southern African Customs Union (SACU) ranks 2nd and United Kingdom ranks 5th of 3 groups.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Southern African Customs Union (SACU) vs United Kingdom: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/total-trade-in-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-gaps-filled/southern-african-customs-union-sacu/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/total-trade-in-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-gaps-filled/southern-african-customs-union-sacu/united-kingdom/">Southern African Customs Union (SACU) vs United Kingdom: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 191 places, 4,859 data points, 1994–2024
Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.