Sri Lanka vs Syria: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar … gaps
Sri Lanka
590.85 million
in 2024
Syria
651.25 million
in 2010
Sri Lanka rank
93rd
Syria rank
91st
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar … gaps over time
- Sri Lanka
- Syria
How they compare
Syria currently reports 651.25 million against 590.85 million in Sri Lanka, a difference of 60.41 million.
That makes Syria's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Syria ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 93rd and Syria ranks 91st of 187 countries.
Syria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Syria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 185.88 million | 386.98 million | 201.10 million | Syria |
| 2010s | 270.68 million | 651.25 million | 380.57 million | Syria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Sri Lanka or Syria?
- Syria, at 651.25 million against 590.85 million in Sri Lanka as of 2010.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Sri Lanka and Syria?
- 60.41 million, with Syria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Syria?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2010.
- How do Sri Lanka and Syria rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Sri Lanka ranks 93rd and Syria ranks 91st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.