Central African Republic vs Sudan: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per
Central African Republic
4.82 units per person
in 2024
Sudan
5.33 units per person
in 2018
Central African Republic rank
176th
Sudan rank
173rd
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per over time
- Central African Republic
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 5.33 units per person against 4.82 units per person in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.51 units per person.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Central African Republic's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 176th and Sudan ranks 173rd of 181 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per, Central African Republic or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 5.33 units per person against 4.82 units per person in Central African Republic as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per between Central African Republic and Sudan?
- 0.51 units per person, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Sudan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2018.
- How do Central African Republic and Sudan rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per?
- Central African Republic ranks 176th and Sudan ranks 173rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.