How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Sri Lanka?

15 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cape Verde vs Sri Lanka: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per

Cape Verde

8,846 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Sri Lanka

8,726 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Cape Verde rank

90th

Sri Lanka rank

91st

Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per over time

Cape Verde
Sri Lanka

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 8,846 units per square kilometre against 8,726 units per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 120 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 90th and Sri Lanka ranks 91st of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cape Verde	Sri Lanka	Difference	Ahead
1990s	1,810 units per square kilometre	1,738 units per square kilometre	72.22 units per square kilometre	Cape Verde
2000s	4,030 units per square kilometre	2,995 units per square kilometre	1,035 units per square kilometre	Cape Verde
2010s	10,967 units per square kilometre	8,179 units per square kilometre	2,788 units per square kilometre	Cape Verde
2020s	7,653 units per square kilometre	10,307 units per square kilometre	2,654 units per square kilometre	Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per, Cape Verde or Sri Lanka?: Cape Verde, at 8,846 units per square kilometre against 8,726 units per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per between Cape Verde and Sri Lanka?: 120 units per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Sri Lanka?: 15 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and Sri Lanka rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per?: Cape Verde ranks 90th and Sri Lanka ranks 91st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Sri Lanka: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/total-trade-in-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/total-trade-in-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/sri-lanka/">Cape Verde vs Sri Lanka: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 4,494 data points, 1994–2023
Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.