Congo vs Zimbabwe: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per

Congo
832.94 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
947.79 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
149th
Zimbabwe rank
147th

Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per over time

  • Congo
  • Zimbabwe
02505007501.0k199420082023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 947.79 units per square kilometre against 832.94 units per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 114.85 units per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Congo ranks 149th and Zimbabwe ranks 147th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 83.01 units per square kilometre 292.51 units per square kilometre 209.5 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 439.74 units per square kilometre 184.53 units per square kilometre 255.21 units per square kilometre Congo
2010s 706.61 units per square kilometre 362.67 units per square kilometre 343.94 units per square kilometre Congo
2020s 424.81 units per square kilometre 846.16 units per square kilometre 421.35 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per, Congo or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 947.79 units per square kilometre against 832.94 units per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per between Congo and Zimbabwe?
114.85 units per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
18 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per?
Congo ranks 149th and Zimbabwe ranks 147th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Zimbabwe: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/total-trade-in-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/total-trade-in-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/zimbabwe/">Congo vs Zimbabwe: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 4,494 data points, 1994–2023
Last refreshed

Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.