How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Timor-Leste?

10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Côte d'Ivoire vs Timor-Leste: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per

Côte d'Ivoire

1,517 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Timor-Leste

1,512 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Côte d'Ivoire rank

133rd

Timor-Leste rank

134th

Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per over time

Côte d'Ivoire
Timor-Leste

How they compare

Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 1,517 units per square kilometre against 1,512 units per square kilometre in Timor-Leste, a difference of 5 units per square kilometre.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Côte d'Ivoire has been ahead every year.

Côte d'Ivoire ranks 133rd and Timor-Leste ranks 134th of 180 countries.

Côte d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Côte d'Ivoire	Timor-Leste	Difference	Ahead
2000s	243.88 units per square kilometre	95.11 units per square kilometre	148.77 units per square kilometre	Côte d'Ivoire
2010s	1,079 units per square kilometre	592.03 units per square kilometre	487.42 units per square kilometre	Côte d'Ivoire
2020s	1,372 units per square kilometre	974.84 units per square kilometre	397.23 units per square kilometre	Côte d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per, Côte d'Ivoire or Timor-Leste?: Côte d'Ivoire, at 1,517 units per square kilometre against 1,512 units per square kilometre in Timor-Leste as of 2023.
What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per between Côte d'Ivoire and Timor-Leste?: 5 units per square kilometre, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Timor-Leste?: 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
How do Côte d'Ivoire and Timor-Leste rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per?: Côte d'Ivoire ranks 133rd and Timor-Leste ranks 134th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Côte d'Ivoire vs Timor-Leste: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/total-trade-in-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/total-trade-in-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/timor-leste/">Côte d'Ivoire vs Timor-Leste: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 4,494 data points, 1994–2023
Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.