Jamaica vs United States of America: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per

Jamaica
25,344 units per square kilometre
in 2023
United States of America
30,282 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
63rd
United States of America rank
60th

Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per over time

  • Jamaica
  • United States of America
010.0k20.0k30.0k199420082023

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 30,282 units per square kilometre against 25,344 units per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 4,938 units per square kilometre.

That makes United States of America's figure about 1.2 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was United States of America ahead.

Jamaica ranks 63rd and United States of America ranks 60th of 180 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica United States of America Difference Ahead
1990s 5,688 units per square kilometre 6,628 units per square kilometre 939.84 units per square kilometre United States of America
2000s 9,169 units per square kilometre 10,602 units per square kilometre 1,434 units per square kilometre United States of America
2010s 12,492 units per square kilometre 18,333 units per square kilometre 5,841 units per square kilometre United States of America
2020s 17,399 units per square kilometre 26,292 units per square kilometre 8,893 units per square kilometre United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per, Jamaica or United States of America?
United States of America, at 30,282 units per square kilometre against 25,344 units per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per between Jamaica and United States of America?
4,938 units per square kilometre, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and United States of America?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and United States of America rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per?
Jamaica ranks 63rd and United States of America ranks 60th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs United States of America: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/total-trade-in-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/total-trade-in-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/united-states/">Jamaica vs United States of America: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 4,494 data points, 1994–2023
Last refreshed

Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.