Myanmar vs Sierra Leone: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per
Myanmar
592.31 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sierra Leone
503.6 units per square kilometre
in 2018
Myanmar rank
162nd
Sierra Leone rank
164th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per over time
- Myanmar
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 592.31 units per square kilometre against 503.6 units per square kilometre in Sierra Leone, a difference of 88.71 units per square kilometre.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.2 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Myanmar ranks 162nd and Sierra Leone ranks 164th of 180 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per, Myanmar or Sierra Leone?
- Myanmar, at 592.31 units per square kilometre against 503.6 units per square kilometre in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per between Myanmar and Sierra Leone?
- 88.71 units per square kilometre, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Sierra Leone?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2018.
- How do Myanmar and Sierra Leone rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per?
- Myanmar ranks 162nd and Sierra Leone ranks 164th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.