How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Italy?

22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Italy: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per

Bosnia and Herzegovina

0.0321 units per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Italy

0.0309 units per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Bosnia and Herzegovina rank

33rd

Italy rank

36th

Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per over time

Bosnia and Herzegovina
Italy

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.0321 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0309 units per US$ of GDP in Italy, a difference of 0.0012 units per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Italy ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 33rd and Italy ranks 36th of 181 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Italy in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bosnia and Herzegovina	Italy	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0147 units per US$ of GDP	0.0163 units per US$ of GDP	0.0016 units per US$ of GDP	Italy
2010s	0.0227 units per US$ of GDP	0.0203 units per US$ of GDP	0.0023 units per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s	0.0323 units per US$ of GDP	0.0285 units per US$ of GDP	0.0037 units per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Italy?: Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.0321 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0309 units per US$ of GDP in Italy as of 2024.
What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Italy?: 0.0012 units per US$ of GDP, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Italy?: 22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Italy rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per?: Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 33rd and Italy ranks 36th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Italy: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/total-trade-in-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/total-trade-in-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/italy/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Italy: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per unit of GDP
Unit: units per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 182 places, 4,615 data points, 1994–2024
Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.