How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jordan?

21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Jordan: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per

Bosnia and Herzegovina

0.0321 units per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Jordan

0.0355 units per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Bosnia and Herzegovina rank

33rd

Jordan rank

31st

Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per over time

Bosnia and Herzegovina
Jordan

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0.0355 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0321 units per US$ of GDP in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.0034 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Jordan ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 33rd and Jordan ranks 31st of 181 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Jordan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bosnia and Herzegovina	Jordan	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0147 units per US$ of GDP	0.0257 units per US$ of GDP	0.011 units per US$ of GDP	Jordan
2010s	0.0227 units per US$ of GDP	0.0218 units per US$ of GDP	0.0009 units per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s	0.0323 units per US$ of GDP	0.0277 units per US$ of GDP	0.0046 units per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Jordan?: Jordan, at 0.0355 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0321 units per US$ of GDP in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jordan?: 0.0034 units per US$ of GDP, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jordan?: 21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jordan rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per?: Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 33rd and Jordan ranks 31st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Jordan: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/total-trade-in-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/total-trade-in-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/jordan/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Jordan: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per unit of GDP
Unit: units per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 182 places, 4,615 data points, 1994–2024
Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.